lunes, 6 de enero de 2014

Silicon Valley, ayer y hoy

Silicon Valley Lost, And Found


Kim-Mai Cuttler - TechCrunch


Silicon Valley is a place that is just as much about people reinventing themselves as it is about people reinventing industries.
As a new year turns, it’s time to go through that silly (but actually necessary) exercise of pausing to reflect. In a world of endless e-mail and distractions, it’s hard to remember where we came from, or where we are collectively going. For better and worse, Silicon Valley suffers from a perpetual loss of memory.
I have three simple stories about reinvention, that hopefully present a historical arc of this place. They belong to my family. For three generations, we have come here — before the orchards were cut down for silicon chip factories, before the chip makers left for Asia, before the dot-com era transformed warehouses into startup offices and before drones and Bitcoin.
1930s-1960s: Hard Sciences
Even though the “Silicon Valley” moniker only came into existence in the 1970s, this place’s history as a technology hub is about a century old. The establishment of Stanford and the University of California system along with generous federal research funding formed an initial pool of talent in the 1930s through 50s.
After escaping Russian pogroms as persecuted Jews during the turn of the 20th century, my great-grandparents managed to make it to Ellis Island. To make ends meet during the Great Depression, they ran a grocery and Jewish deli in Los Angeles. My grandfather used to tell me stories of 5-cent hamburgers and being cast as a Liszt-piano playing extra in the Frank Sinatra film “Anchors Aweigh” when he was a teenager.
They never had much, so my grandfather ran out of money after four quarters of college and had to drop out of Stanford. He left to join a small electronics company back in Los Angeles to work on frequency meters and to help the family out with money.
It took him about nine years to come back and finish. It was a setback, but along the way he met my grandmother. He didn’t get his bachelor’s degree until he was 30 — an age that some people might be written off in this forever youth-obsessed industry.
grandpa-2
But he went onto become one of a few elite physicists that designed the world’s most accurate timepieces. In the 1970s, his atomic clocks were flown around the world to prove parts of Einstein’s general theory of relativity — the idea that time does slow down when you move closer to a strong source of gravity.
In 1966, when Dave Packard enlisted my grandfather to be part of the founding team for HP Labs, Packard said something to the effect of, “We have drunk from the Well of Knowledge for many years. It’s now time to return something to that well.” While it’s easy to look at photo-sharing apps or social, mobile, local concepts and say that Silicon Valley is just pushing around eyeballs for ad dollars, this ambition lingers. It’s the same kind of thinking that fuels Google X’s moonshots and SpaceX rockets past the earth’s stratosphere.
In classic Valley fashion, my grandfather never really accumulated too many possessions beyond some antique clocks because of his fascination with ultra-precise time-keeping. Ever the engineer, he would do quality assurance on Thanksgiving dinners by testing a prototype turkey ahead of time. Then after a BART crash in Fremont in the 1970s, he was asked to design a better system that would prevent train blockages. So in a way, he contributed to both the immaterial and very physical fabric that binds Silicon Valley together.
The point of bringing his story up is that we are standing on the shoulders of giants. The consumer Internet era owes itself to the proliferation of PCs in the 1980s and 1990s, which then owe themselves back to basic research efforts and funding that formed the foundation of Silicon Valley back in the 1930s and 40s.
Around the time of my grandfather’s death, his clocks were providing as much as 80 percent of the data used to support International Atomic Time. IAT is the basis of Coordinated Universal Time or UTC, the standard upon which Internet communications are synchronized. Back in the 1990s, even Netscape kept a couple of atomic clocks in their offices. Great technical contributions can happen later in life, even though it often seems like VCs are always hunting for the next naively determined Harvard or Stanford dropout.
Even until my grandfather died of a heart attack while hiking in Big Basin at the age of 78, he was working. He never retired because he loved what he did.
1965-1995: The PC era and a new wave of immigrants
silicon-valley-orchards
Silicon Valley was mostly orchards in the 1950s.
In 1965, a law was signed that would change the face of Silicon Valley forever. The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 reversed decades of discriminatory quotas against immigrants from Asia, Latin America, Africa and the Middle East.
Because of war, political instability, repression or weak economic growth, Silicon Valley became a magnet for technically-skilled immigrants from East Asia, India and the former Soviet Union. This place prospered because corrupt and authoritarian regimes cost these countries their best resource — their people. At that time, India and China’s governments were barely two decades old and had yet to make the economic reforms necessary to create the kind of sustained growth that now makes them attractive markets to start companies in.
So given the choice, the U.S. was often a no brainer at that time. My mother was part of this wave, although she came as a war refugee instead of a technically-skilled migrant favored by the 1965 law.
She and her seven siblings (two of whom died in childhood) grew up in the bustle of 1960s Saigon. They grew up with pigs and chickens and episodes of the original Star Trek with Kirk and Spock, even as firefights and bombs often erupted on the outskirts of the city.
By 1974, it became clear that the American-backed government in South Vietnam was not going to last, so my mother left for Australia on her own at 18 and enrolled in the University of New South Wales. The hardest part of being there was not about being one of the very few women studying computer science in the 1970s (though imagine that!) The hardest part was that she lost contact with her family. For several months, she was alone. As Viet Cong forces rolled into Saigon, she had no idea if her sisters and parents were alive. Many of the other students in her program became depressed or suicidal.
Fortunately, my immediate family was lucky enough to make it out one day in 1975. They carried as much gold as they could in the linings of their clothing and discreetly snuck down bullethole-ridden streets. They sought out one of the last remaining aircraft carriers docked in the city. There was little time. While being ferried to the carrier, my aunts saw other refugees fall off the packed boats and drown. Still other high school classmates of my mother’s left on smaller boats only to be attacked by Thai pirates, who robbed and raped those on-board.
Even after crossing part of the Pacific to a Guam refugee camp, it still hadn’t hit them that they were never going back. It’s been almost 40 years now.
When my mother finished up in Australia and decided to reunite with the rest of the family in the U.S., they looked for a place to put down roots.
One morning in 1979, my mom opened the Sydney Morning Herald and there was this article in the business section about a place called “Silicon Valley.” It described a place full of industrial parks, burgeoning companies and most importantly, opportunity.
On a visit the following year, she and my grandfather, who barely spoke a word of English, bought Greyhound tickets all the way to California from Michigan. When she got here, she went up and down the peninsula, visiting Advanced Micro Devices and Stanford.
Somehow she knew in her bones that this was the place. My mom and her family crammed themselves into a one-bedroom apartment in Alameda until they could scrape together enough money to move closer to the heart of the Valley.
Even then, they couldn’t afford a car, so my aunts took the county bus system around the peninsula. They used the public buses like tourists, soaking in everything about their new country. One afternoon while riding a bus, my aunt saw that she was coming up on Hewlett-Packard’s corporate headquarters in Palo Alto. She stopped the bus, marched straight to the reception desk and asked if there was an HR person around. Then she demanded an interview on the spot. A week later she had a job.
Between the six sisters, they eventually saved up enough money to buy a house in San Jose, when real estate prices were still reasonable in the 1980s. Eventually, when they each started families, they moved into the same Cupertino neighborhood. This wasn’t a fact that I fully understood or appreciated until I lived in Vietnam in my early 20s — that many extended Vietnamese families all live in the same village.
Even though they lost their homeland, my mom and her sisters recreated their own village on the other side of the world.
With great loss came the chance for reinvention.
silicon-valley-suburbs
But it transformed into suburbs and industrial parks over the next generation.
1990s-onward: Web 1.0 and 2.0
I am not a child of the Great Depression nor am I a war refugee. I’m incredibly humbled by what my parents and grandparents have been able to do.
When I was younger, I took this place for granted. My dad spent his weekends with soldering irons and my high school friends literally lugged their desktop computers around the neighborhood to have LAN parties.
As a child, something seemed dead to me about the tech industry in the 1980s and early 1990s. Before the first Internet bubble, the Valley’s leading companies had tens of thousands of employees. It was more Dilbert and Office Space than phone phreaks and hackers. Take Your Children To Work Day meant seeing a sea of bland cubicles submerged beneath seven to ten layers of corporate management. You couldn’t be two people and impact 10 million users then. Across the city where I grew up, Apple was shuttering its old offices left and right because it was the early 1990s. Microsoft was winning.
Around that time, there was the ugly proxy battle over the fate of Hewlett-Packard, one of the foundational companies of Silicon Valley and the one to which my family gave more than 100 years of collective service. The Hewlett family lost, the HP-Compaq merger went through, and the soul of a once great company died. While it’s easy to make fun of older companies in Silicon Valley, it’s hard to remember that they were once hungry and foolish too. Still, even though HP was lost, many other great companies like Google and Apple prospered in its place. Silicon Valley moved on.
I did too. Being a simultaneously naive and jaded teenager, I didn’t pursue what should have been a more technically inclined path and instead decided to be a journalist.
After university, editing my college newspaper and a string of decent internships, I left the Bay Area to go and live on three other continents. I went and lived in Vietnam, where I met my grandmother’s estranged sister. They last saw each other in 1954, when my grandmother decided to side with the U.S.-backed Southern Vietnamese government while her sister became a loyal Communist in the North. They exchanged some 50 years of letters filled with everything from mundane life updates to arguments about the relative merits of Communism and capitalism, which sometimes angered my grandmother to no end.
Then I ended up working in financial journalism in London, thinking that a foreign posting was a great escape from the bland industrial parks, highways and strip malls of California. But during the time I was away, my grandfather and maternal grandmother, who survived several decades of war and played a huge role in raising me, passed away. I missed them.
Working with bankers and traders also wasn’t the same as dealing with founders, engineers and hackers day in and day out. People were sharp, but they didn’t love their work — not the way my grandfather or dad did. Jobs in banking were a means to accumulate year-end bonuses and holidays. They didn’t spend their spare time messing with a half-dozen oscilloscopes or building makeshift telescopes.
There is a line in T.S. Eliot’s “Four Quartets” that says, “The end of all our exploring shall be to arrive where we started and know the place as if for the first time.” So after the 2008 financial crash and several years away, I came home and became a tech journalist.
Ceaseless Changing
Some things are different from a generation or two ago. The more power and wealth the technology industry generates and the more it becomes embedded in everyday life, the more it attracts people who desire the trappings of wealth and power over the act of building and creating itself.
Through glamorizing acquisitions and playing up industry personalities, TechCrunch has played no small part in this. It’s a double-edged sword: by celebrating entrepreneurship, more people are emboldened to try it than ever before. On the whole, it’s probably a good thing for many more experiments to happen and for more people to take agency in their own lives. But it also means that we will have more prospective founders doing it for the ends, rather than the means or the journey.
The first contract Hewlett-Packard ever closed as a startup was one to build audio oscillators for the Disney movie Fantasia. Their products were several layers removed from the end consumer experience, so you really had to be a geek if you were going to work here. There was not much glamour or fame to be had. No Fortune or Forbes covers. No eight- or nine-figure exits. No hordes of Twitter or Instagram followers.
Today, technology companies like Facebook are replacing TV and movies. They are our new cultural mediums.
So in the same way that the medium influences the message, the medium also influences the kinds of people who choose to work in this industry. That’s why the Valley sometimes feels increasingly like the entertainment industry, with users shuttling from app to app like the hot restaurant or club opening of the week.
Secondly, the Valley is now a global mindset, not a single geographic destination. While it is still hard to find an ecosystem in the world that is nearly as supportive or as dense as Silicon Valley, the gap between here and communities elsewhere is narrowing.
The no-brainer decision that my mother made to come to the U.S. a generation ago is not so clear anymore. Beijing is an equally fascinating and active hub to start a company in. Many of the startups I meet now are distributed from the beginning, with offices here and in Bangalore, Slovenia, Pakistan, Finland and elsewhere. Silicon Valley is one very strong node among many.
Thirdly, I live in San Francisco and not the Peninsula, mirroring the Valley’s general move north into the city and this generation’s desire to live in urban cities over suburban areas. This urban shift has created painful consequences for San Francisco, while creating opportunities for diversification in other tech hubs like New York and Berlin. If software is eating the world, then the technology industry is eating more of the Bay Area.
This last year has been the most difficult and we need to find a more constructive way for San Francisco to accommodate people that want to be here and for the city to retain its quirkiness and diversity. With my own rent more than doubling over the last few years, I probably won’t be able to stay here long-term, either. Unless the city boosts the housing stock dramatically, San Francisco will increasingly become a city solely for the very young and the very rich.
However, in other ways, what drew my mother and my grandfather here is very much alive. A desire for non-conformity and a grandness of aspiration still exists in certain entrepreneurs here. The 150-year-old Gold Rush mentality lingers on in the engineers who show up every year from all over the world to try their luck at starting new companies. The Valley’s unique cultural language around materialism and status persists. While it does get flashier every year, there is still a certain discretion about being well-dressed or having a nice car here, at least compared to New York or Los Angeles.
That’s because this place is still such a lottery. Beneath the hard work is a hell of a lot of luck. Some years, you are up. Other years, you are down. One month, you are running the Valley’s most celebrated company. And the next, you are everyone’s favorite punching bag. Sometimes you raise a motherlode of a Series B, and a year later the entire landscape has changed around you and you’re screwed.
Everyone engaged in the act of changing the world is self-delusional on some level. Some small percentage of the time, the delusional succeed. That is part of the hits-driven nature of the venture business. This is the entrepreneur-as-hero myth that has become necessary to perpetuate the ecosystem here.
Few companies end up being wildly successful. Some fail outright. But most end up in some stomach-churning netherworld in-between. Invariably, all these startups are having problems hiring good engineers. The pool of job candidates is so tight many founders I know are having to scour universities around the rest of the country or hire abroad.
So like my mother and grandfather, who showed up here in their twenties, the young arrive all over again, even though they can barely afford the security deposits on apartments.
Once and young, they come, hungry to walk that tenuous line between self-awareness and self-delusion necessary for the act of creation.
As they reinvent themselves, they reinvent this place just the way my parents and grandparents did. We are lost and then found once more.

viernes, 3 de enero de 2014

¿La conectividad es un derecho humano fundamental?

Mark Zuckerberg says connectivity is a basic human right – do you agree?
Amid a year of online innovations, the Facebook founder says a better-connected world benefits local economies. Is he right?


It's good to talk … Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg believes the world is better off connected. Photograph: Paul Sakuma/AP

Over the past year, several significant online innovations have emerged. It was predicted that mobile phones would outnumber people by 2014, with low-cost smartphones opening up opportunities for even more people to get connected. And the UN turned to the internet to canvass opinion on what should replace the millennium development goals.

In August, Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg announced that he aimed to get every person on the planet online. He then launched internet.org, along with a 10-page document entitled Connectivity is a Human Right that outlines his vision of the future.

This followed the 2010 launch of Facebook Zero, a text-only version of the site with no data charges. In the 18 months since its launch, Facebook users in Africa increased by 114%. The business benefits for the popular social-networking site are obvious, but Zuckerberg believes a better-connected world is better for local economies, too.

Next came Twitter, which in December signed a deal with a Swiss mobile company to enable cheap access to users of phones with basic features or on low-cost plans.

Wikipedia also got in on the act. Its foundation, Wikimedia, has a clear mission: to create a world "in which every single human being can freely share the sum of all knowledge''. Last year the company launched Wikipedia Zero, a flagship programme that partners with mobile phone providers to let people browse with no data charges. As with Facebook, the term "zero" signifies free data.

In October, Wikipedia joined forces with Airtel to provide Wikipedia Zero by SMS for the first time in Kenya. Users can text *515# to receive an invite to search Wikipedia; they are then sent the information requested a paragraph at a time. After a three-month trial they hope to expand the service. Wikimedia hopes to reach 1 billion people by 2015.

The most recent partnership announced by Wikipedia is in Burma, which has a 10% mobile phone penetration rate, one of the lowest in the world.

Meanwhile, Groundsource is testing a new platform to ensure that communities that are not online are able to get their voices heard. The platform, which works on feature phones, hopes to bring people together over shared concerns and connect them with journalists.

In India there are an estimated 200m internet users, but only 30% are women. Google hopes to change this by helping 50 million women go digital over the year. It's helping women get online website gives a step-by-step guide to the internet, from computer basics to language preferences. Mothers are targeted by "inspirational" quotes such as "internet moms connect well with their kids" and "internet moms make meals fun". The company has also set up a toll-free helpline and partnered with companies to raise awareness of the initiative offline.

There are also innovations such as BRCK, a low-cost modem, designed for Africa, that can switch between ethernet, Wi-Fi and 3G/4G connection. Its backup battery means it can last for eight hours off grid.

So are we going to see a dramatic increase in the number of people getting online in developing countries over the next few years? How can people overcome the barriers of high charges, low network coverage, a lack of reliable electricity and restrictions to information due to laws enforced by their governments?

We want to hear from you. Do you agree with Zuckerberg's view that connectivity is a human right? Will his initiative have an impact on your life, or do you see it as simply a marketing strategy by global tech companies?

How does your internet behaviour differ from five years ago? Many people now turn to the web for information on key services – are you among them?

We'd like to hear about similar innovations that have caught your eye.

jueves, 2 de enero de 2014

Un cocinera se va de Facebook porque pierde dinero

This Irate Cookbook Author Represents A Swelling Threat To Facebook's $6 Billion Ad Business


Stephanie Stiavetti is a freelance food writer.
She is the author of a cookbook called "Melt: The Art of Macaroni and Cheese," published by Little, Brown, and Company.
She is at the vanguard of a swelling movement against Facebook.
Stiavetti knows that as an author and writer, she is a one-woman brand — and that she needs to market her brand as best she can on the Internet. 
So she's got active profiles everywhere: Twitter, Pinterest, Instagram, and Google Plus.
One place online where Stiavetti has decided to be less active about promoting herself is Facebook.
That's pretty surprising, for two reasons: 
  • Facebook is by far the world's biggest social network, with almost a billion people using it every single day.
  • Stiavetti is popular on Facebook. She has 8,000 fans.
So why is she leaving? 
Because, she says, only about 1% of those 8,000 fans see the status updates, recipes, and photos she puts on Facebook.
She writes:
I have 8,000 followers. Over the past few months my engagement has slowed to less than a trickle – a tiny fraction of what it was at the beginning of the year. Now, when I post to my Facebook page for The Culinary Life, only 100 people see those posts (on average). Facebook then tries to charge me $20 so that you can see my content. Given that I don’t make any money from the stories and photos I post – please note there are not any ads on my site – paying hundreds of dollars a month to access you, the fans who willingly liked my page, is just not possible.
To make matter worse, Facebook has been charging page owners to run ads, which is in essence buying followers. That’s not a problem in and of itself, but when they charge to grow a page’s following and then remove access to those very same followers after they’ve accepted money for them, well, I find that incredibly unethical…
…I’m very sad that Facebook has decided to exclude the blogging community from accessing our loyal friends and fans, you who we love so dearly and are the reason we put so much work into creating recipes, photographing dishes, and publishing post after post. Really, you are the reason we work so hard. It’s terrible that Facebook has decided to hide our work from your eyes after you’ve already expressed interest in seeing it. We are not large brands selling products; the vast majority of food bloggers are moms, dads, husbands, wives, hobbyists, students, writers — everyday folks who just want to invite you into our kitchens.
Stiavetti isn't alone in her outrage at Facebook.
At the beginning of December, Facebook changed the algorithm it uses to select which "stories" appear in users News Feeds — that center column of photos, updates, videos and ads you see when you go to Facebook.com or open a Facebook app.
Facebook said it was changing the algorithm so that it would highlight higher quality news stories and show fewer silly photos.
Spokespeople for several companies told us that the "reach" of their Facebook posts declined by as much 80% after the changes.
Like Stiavetti, the people running those pages assumed Facebook actually changed its algorithm not to have the News Feed show higher quality  news stories, but to force Facebook page operators to buy ads from Facebook if they wanted reach.
In an email to Business Insider, a Facebook spokesperson said that was not the motivation behind the News Feed change. He said the most likely reason "organic" posts from Facebook pages weren't getting seen was that, during the holiday season, retailers are buying lots of ads for the News Feed, and those are crowding out the non-paid content.
The problem for Facebook is that appearances are reality — and to Facebook page managers, small like Stiavetti or big like several national retailers we spoke to, it appears that Facebook is shaking them down for bigger ad spends. They feel like suckers in a bait-and-switch scheme.
That "reality" has them angry.
Jim Tobin, who runs a social media marketing agency called Ignite, says clients like his are the reason Facebook has annual revenues of $6 billion. 
He says that Facebook used to be a great place for a brand because "you could you could have a presence for free and then pay to boost it."
Now that content posted to Facebook will only seen by .01% to 2.5% of its fans, that free "presence" is basically gone.
Tobin says his clients may soon leave Facebook and take their $6 billion with them.
"We as brands have the ability to take our money elsewhere. It's not like there's a lack of social networks for us to take our business."

Business Insider

lunes, 30 de diciembre de 2013

Democracia financiera

La única incubadora que permite elegir quién será financiado 

por Issie LAPOWSKY
¿Crees que eres más inteligente que un VC ? Village de Capital permite a los empresarios deciden quién se destinan los fondos. Es un plan tan loco, que sólo podría funcionar.

Ross Baird tiene un problema con el status quo en el Silicon Valley.

"Silicon Valley se supone que es tan innovador, pero la gente gastar un montón de aplicaciones de tiempo haciendo sólo para que no tengamos que llamar para hacer reservaciones para la cena ", dice. "Hace que la vida yuppies ' más conveniente, pero no es en realidad la solución de los problemas del mundo. "

Es debido a este sector de la carne con la rutina que Baird lanzó Village capital. Es un nuevo tipo de incubadora y fondos de inversión que no sólo realiza copias de las empresas que tienen como objetivo resolver los problemas del mundo, pero también elige el que las empresas se financia de una forma completamente diferente. Es decir, no elige en realidad las empresas, en absoluto. Los empresarios hacen.

¿Cómo funciona?


Desde su fundación en 2009, Village Capital, con sede en Atlanta, ha sido pionera en un modelo de inversión único par que pone a los empresarios en el cargo. La firma ha patrocinado 23 programas en siete países de todo el mundo, donde los fundadores se reúnen durante tres meses para desarrollar sus ideas de negocio, al igual que una incubadora tradicional. La diferencia es que al final de esos tres meses, que es el resto de los empresarios de la cohorte que decidir qué empresa obtiene la inversión final.

Baird concebida de este enfoque único, mientras trabajaba en la empresa de inversión de impacto Gray Ventures, Ghost. Él se sentía frustrado por el hecho de que el modelo de capital de riesgo, tal y como existe hoy en día, favorece a las empresas que puedan prometer a los inversores una salida rápida.

"El fondo de la gente las empresas se parecen más a Facebook y LinkedIn que los tipos de empresas que pueden tardar un tiempo más largo para construir, pero tendría beneficios desproporcionadamente positivos para el mundo", dice. "El problema que creo que hemos diagnosticado es la forma de apoyar a los empresarios de hoy en los mercados de capitales. "

Debido a que los otros empresarios en la cohorte no resisten a hacer una vuelta, sus decisiones se basan menos en la planificación de una salida rápida y más sobre el potencial impacto que la puesta en marcha podría tener. Por supuesto, eso no significa que ellos dan a la viabilidad financiera del todo. Tres veces por sesión, cada inicio en los primeros grados de cohortes cada otra startup en 24 indicadores diferentes, que van desde potencial de rentabilidad a la capacidad del producto o servicio para crear un cambio. ( Las empresas no están autorizados para clasificar a sí mismos. ) Las dos nuevas empresas en los primeros lugares en la última evaluación son los que son financiadas.

Los Resultados


El modelo de inversión de pares ha dado algunos puntos de datos interesantes que no se encuentran en la tradicional inversión de capital de riesgo. Por ejemplo, las empresas dirigidas por mujeres tienen muchas más probabilidades de obtener financiación a través de la inversión de los compañeros que a través de los fondos tradicionales. Eso, dice Baird, debe llamar la atención de los inversores, ya que las empresas dirigidas por mujeres, investigaciones recientes sugieren, entregar mayores retornos a los inversionistas.

"El mercado está infravalorando un activo específico que es la mujer las empresas co -fundó ", dice Baird. "Las mujeres, encontramos, tienden a prometer menos y el exceso de entregar. Los hombres tienden a sobre- promesa y bajo - entregar. En el mundo del espíritu empresarial cuando se tienen dos minutos, el exceso de prometer ayuda. " Cuando las mujeres llegan a lanzar más de tres meses a un cuarto de sus compañeros en lugar de dos minutos para un grupo de inversionistas, en otras palabras, ellos reciben un trato más justo.

Hasta la fecha, 350 empresarios han participado en los programas internacionales de Village capitales, y 32 han recibido inversiones. Entre ellas se encuentran empresas como MobileWorks, que trabaja con clientes corporativos para externalizar el trabajo de oficina y administrativo a los trabajadores virtuales de bajos ingresos. Patinete, antes llamada Drop the Chalk, es otra estrella alumbre Village capital y Inc. 30 menores de 30 finalistas, que fabrica software para ayudar a los maestros mejor desempeño de los estudiantes de pista. Otra empresa reciente prometedor, SevaMob, ofrece atención médica y el seguro a las personas que viven en la pobreza en la India y África, pero sus trabajadores de la salud también recoger datos anónimos sobre las personas a las que atienden, que SevaMob puede vender a las grandes empresas interesadas en el desarrollo de los mercados mundiales.

 Obviamente, se trata de empresas que no sólo tienen un impacto social, pero podrían tener un carácter financiero, también. Después de todo, Village El capital no es un esfuerzo totalmente altruista, sino que está en busca de inversiones, tanto individuos de alto y la inversión de impacto empresas que están dispuestas a ser un poco más paciente regresa - patrimonio neto. La participación del pueblo de capital en las empresas suele oscilar entre el 5 y el 10 por ciento. En cuanto a cuánto tiempo la empresa está dispuesto a esperar por una salida, Baird dice que son flexibles - they'll incluso hacer un acuerdo de ingresos compartido que paga la empresa a cámara lenta.

"Estamos tratando de construir diferentes tipos de estructuras que conforman los fiduciarios cómodo con empresas portadoras que se podrían crear el mundo en que vivimos ", dice Baird.

Inc.com

domingo, 29 de diciembre de 2013

8 empresas tecnológicas que pueden cotizar en Bolsa en 2014

8 Tech Companies That May Go Public in 2014




This has been a busy year for IPOs. In total, 222 companies went public in the U.S. in 2013, raising nearly $55 billion, which represents the most IPO activity since 2000, according to data from Renaissance Capital.
Twitter was perhaps the most hyped IPO of the year and one of the best performing to date. The social network raised $1.8 billion from its IPO in November and its stock has nearly tripled in less than two months. Other tech companies like Zulily, FireEye and Rocket Fuel are trading well above their IPO prices as well, though these were comparatively smaller IPOs.
chart1


While we may not see another tech company go public in the coming year with as much hype as Twitter, there are plenty of notable tech companies still in the IPO pipeline.
CB Insights, a research firm, recently released a report noting that there are 590 venture-funded tech companies in the U.S. with valuations of at least $100 million and healthy trajectories, which would make them viable candidates to go public. Of these, just more than two dozen are said to have valuations of $1 billion or more.
Screen Shot 2013-12-24 at 4.58.43 PM


We've highlighted 8 businesses that are reportedly considering going public in the next year or so.

Box

Box, a cloud storage service, has repeatedly said that it plans to go public sometime in 2014. The company, which is valued at $2 billion, has reportedly selected bankers for its IPO.
As Mashable reported previously, Box has also been holding mock earnings calls to prepare for life as a public company. "We want to be acting like a public company before we go public," Dylan Smith, co-founder and CFO of Box, told Mashable back in July.

Dropbox

Box isn't the only cloud business expected to public in the near future. Dropbox, which had beenrumored to be considering an IPO for 2013, is now said to be raising a new $250 million round of funding at an $8 billion valuation. The funding, according to the New York Times, is intended to help the business stay private for a few more months and boost its valuation before going public sometime in 2014.

Square

Twitter hadn't even started to trade on the stock market before rumors surfaced that co-founder Jack Dorsey was planning to take Square public. Square, a mobile payments company valued at $3.25 billion and cofounded by Dorsey after he left Twitter, has reportedly begun talking to banks about pursuing a public offering in 2014. Dorsey, for his part, has admitted that a Square IPO will happen "eventually."
"Eventually we'll get there," Dorsey told Bloomberg in an interview. "Right now we're building the practice within the company and building the discipline. I think Square is ahead of a lot of companies in that regard because I think we're building a financial company."

Shazam

Shazam, the popular music discovery tool, brought on a new CEO this year and raised a $40 million round of funding to accelerate growth before pursuing a public offering. Rich Riley, the company's current CEO, told Mashable in August that an IPO was "at least" a year away, meaning it might take place in the second half of 2014 or else sometime in 2015.

Alibaba

Alibaba, the largest e-commerce site in China, is expected to go public in 2014 in what may be the largest public offering since Facebook. While Alibaba may not be a household name in the U.S., its IPO will likely help another company that is: Yahoo. The U.S. tech company is the second largest shareholder in Alibaba and Yahoo stock has already benefited from this. That said, the IPO may not happen until later in 2014 or 2015: Alibaba is reportedly looking to extend a loan through next year to buy more time before going public.

King

You may not be familiar with Midasplayer (or King.com, as it's more commonly referred to), but chances are you're familiar with its hugely successful game Candy Crush. The company, which was founded a decade ago, has reportedly hired several banks for an IPO and was said to be considering one for 2013. A more recent report, however, suggested that the company would wait until 2014 in order to prove to potential investors that it has other popular games up its sleeve besides Candy Crush. To put that another way, King wants to prove that it can avoid some of the issues that have plagued Zynga as a public company.
Rovio, the company behind the popular Angry Birds games, has also been rumored to be considering going public, but the company's execs have repeatedly said it has no plans to do so anytime soon.

Gilt Groupe

Each year, there seem to be reports that Gilt Groupe will go public in the year to come — usually fueled by the company's execs — and this year is no different. Gilt Groupe went through multiple rounds of layoffs in recent years, brought on a new CEO from Citigroup at the end of 2012 andsold off one of its properties, Jetsetter, early this year. So once again, the company is rumored to be pursuing an IPO, this time in late 2014.
If and when Gilt does go public, it won't be the first flash sales service to do so. Zulily, a flash sales site geared towards mothers and children, went public in November. Its stock is currently trading around $40 a share, nearly double its IPO price.

Seamless

Seamless merged with GrubHub earlier this year and recent reports suggest the food delivery giant is cooking up an IPO for sometime next year. According to one report, Seamless may either go public in late 2014 or early 2015 with a market cap of up to $5 billion.
Other popular Internet services like Pinterest and Spotify are believed to be candidates for public offerings sometime down the road, but no timetables have been reported for either yet.
Image: Bill Pugliano/Getty
Mashable

sábado, 28 de diciembre de 2013

Emprendedorismo tecnológico que supera la pobreza

Meet the entrepreneur who has lifted 15,000 young people over the poverty line





In rural Northern Uganda, a group of workers assemble each day in a shipping container, which is equipped with solar panels on the roof and high-speed Internet access. These workers are trained by an U.S.-based nonprofit organization called Samasource to perform work for fast-growing tech companies like LinkedIn and Eventbrite.
At Samasource’s helm is a 31-year-old San Franciscan: Leila Janah.
Inspiration for the company struck when Janah was just a teenager and teaching English to high school students in Ghana. During this trip, she noticed that the country’s most talented and well-educated young people could not find employment opportunities and were wasting away in slums.
In her 20s, Janah quit her steady day job at a consulting firm to launch Samasource. She became one of the pioneers of a new “microwork” model and the face of the emerging technology-for-good movement.
Today, Samasource is flourishing, with thousands of young people in emerging nations earning a fair wage to perform computer work, including content moderation, photo-tagging, and routine data entry. Samasource takes a small cut of the overall budget from corporate clients to sustain its operations.
I caught up with Janah during a break in preparations for an upcoming fundraiser. Each year, her gala draws Silicon Valley’s most glamorous entrepreneurs, and it typically raises hundreds of thousands of dollars for charitable causes. It’s a particularly exciting time for the entrepreneur, who recently announced her engagement to investor and yoga instructor Benjamin Lesley, and a new crowdfunding site called Samahope.

Entrepreneurship meets philanthropy

Samasource is a bit different from most nonprofits, as it aims to generate sustainable revenues. Janah has also borrowed management techniques from the most successful tech companies, like Facebook and Google.
“The nonprofit world is embracing lean business methods and is more comfortable with the idea of experimentation and failure,” she said.
Janah first got the idea when she moved to Ghana as a teenager and made friends with many of the locals, many of whom couldn’t find reasonable employment.
After college, she joined an elite management-consulting firm and went to Southeast Asia to work on a project. In the bustling city of Mumbai, she made the acquaintance of a man living in the slums, the site of the hit indie flickSlumdog Millionaire. “He helped me realize that there were young people with secondary school education living in poverty, who have the skill and will to work,” she told me.

Pioneering the microwork model

Corporations such as Walmart, LinkedIn, eBay, Evenbrite, and Getty Images have already signed up as Samasource clients.
“We have brought these companies into places you would never expect digital work,” she said.
They negotiate a fee with Samasource, and Janah’s team on the ground provides training, equipment, quality assurance, and more. Workers in the developing world receive a fair wage, and with opportunities for career advancement.
Since Janah introduced the microwork model, over 15,000 people have been lifted from the poverty line, and 92 percent move on to higher paying work or higher education. The majority of Samasource’s workers are under 30, and over 50 percent are women, according to Janah.

Starting Samasource

Janah does not hail from a privileged background and has hustled her way up the career ladder. She did not have a nest egg to fall back on when she quit the consulting firm.
“It took a long time to get Samasource off the ground,” she explained. In 2008, she couldn’t afford health insurance and was earning less than $400 a month. She slept on a friend’s futon in San Francisco and tutored over the weekends to make ends meet.
Indeed, starting a nonprofit is not for the faint-hearted. “It’s a slog,” she remarks. “You have to be resilient and in it for the long haul.”
Despite her struggles, Janah believes it has become exponentially easier for anyone to start a nonprofit. New service-oriented startups like Uber and Taskrabbit offer flexible work and a decent hourly wage.

The challenges of running a business

Janah recently experienced some drama on her board of directors, and it’s still fresh on her mind. She emerged from the whole episode with the realization that a far more insidious form of sexism exists: paternalism.
“I used to think that the worst form of discrimination for women was being hit on or hearing something disparaging,” she said. “What’s even more challenging for young women is a very senior male who will take an interest in you, who see themselves as father figures or mentors.”
According to Janah, when there’s a difference in opinion, the relationship will quickly turn nasty.
“These paternal figures can’t handle being defied, and that’s a big problem,” she said.
Janah advises that other entrepreneurs stay true to their vision despite intimidation tactics from older colleagues.

Lessons learned

Janah admits that she hasn’t been the most supportive CEO in the past. However, in her 30s, she’s begun to dedicate more time to managing people and refining her leadership style.
“I used to think my job as a CEO meant managing metrics and meeting goals,” she told me. “But I’ve realized now that’s it’s about managing my board and employees.”
Her advice to fellow female executives? Ensure that others can feel and experience your passion. “True leadership isn’t about having an idea. It’s about having an idea and recruiting other people to execute on this vision,” she said.
Janah admits that she used to dedicate upward of 16 hours a day to her work. “It’s not glamorous, but I think there’s something to be said for the sheer number of hours you can work,” she said. The entrepreneur still intends to work hard, but she has realized that more hours don’t necessarily mean better results.
Her secret to success is that she can survive on very little sleep. “I have a lot of energy, which I pour into the company.” However, for the sake of clarity (and her employees, who don’t all share her stamina), she intends to take short vacations with her fiancé and relax at home. She describes her future husband as an attentive partner, one who deserves her time and attention.
“In the long-term, the only way to be successful in this path is to have a good support network,” she concluded. “I have to invest in that network.”

jueves, 26 de diciembre de 2013

La demanda de aplicaciones en Navidad puede caer estacionalmente

¿Por qué la Navidad es un momento doloroso para los desarrolladores de aplicaciones?
Por Leo Mirani @ lmirani


Juegos Aplicaciones móviles : de todos taza de té. Reuters / Bobby Yip

Ese conmovedora/nauseabundo anuncio de Apple deja fuera un aspecto muy importante de lo que se ha convertido en una tradición navideña del siglo 21. El día de Navidad, cuando las personas abren sus regalos y encuentran brillante nuevos teléfonos inteligentes o computadoras de la tableta, lo primero que van a hacer es iniciar la descarga de aplicaciones. Primero vendrá el asiduos - Facebook, WhatsApp, Angry Birds- y luego irán a la caza de más, por lo general juegos. Más aplicaciones se descargarán mañana que en un solo día antes de éste.

Esto es a la vez una buena noticia y una mala noticia para los desarrolladores de aplicaciones y editores. Un golpe puede significar millones de nuevas descargas. Pero para llegar allí también implica gastar millones en marketing. Y aparte de los mayores editores, pocos pueden contar con lo que recuperar ese dinero.

Viernes negro para aplicaciones


Redimensionada AppDownloads_perHour_Xmas2012 -600

En 2012, el mundo se descargaron 328 millones de aplicaciones en el día de Navidad, según la firma de análisis Flurry, en comparación con un promedio diario de 155 millones de dólares entre el 1 de diciembre y el 20 de diciembre. Eso fue un tercio más que el año anterior. Este año será más grande aún. " La temporada festiva es un momento clave en el ciclo de vida de un jugador cuando se está buscando activamente nuevos contenidos", tal como Superdata, otra firma de investigación que se especializa en los juegos, lo propone.

A pesar de la naturaleza aparentemente orgánica del proceso, sin embargo, millones de dólares de la planificación y la promoción han ido a conseguir su abuelo o sobrina o descargar un juego en particular. Según Joost van Dreunen de Superdata, cada juego instalado en noviembre costó su editor 5 dólares en la comercialización y promoción - conocido como "costo por instalar" (CPI ) en la jerga. Durante el período de vacaciones, que podría alcanzar los $ 7 u $ 8, dice. Pero la cantidad editores recuperar de los usuarios será inferior a la mitad, Superdata reconoce.

CPI- article- imagen

Las técnicas que utilizan pueden variar. Algunos dependen de las promociones relativamente simples, tales como la publicidad, descuentos, nuevos juegos y escribir -ups en la prensa. Otros, según informa Bloomberg, el uso tácticas de ceño fruncido tales como la contratación de empresas que garantizan un número de descargas por lo que el título aparece alto en la lista de una tienda de aplicaciones de las principales aplicaciones. Promoción cruzada es también una estrategia popular. En Japón, los grandes títulos como Puzzle & Dragons y Clash of Clanes anuncian juntos. La saga de Candy Crush utiliza los anuncios de televisión. Y no son sólo los desarrolladores de aplicaciones que están tratando de jugo de los números. Desde hoy y hasta el sábado 28 de diciembre, Amazon está ofreciendo $ 5 de crédito gratis para descargas en su nueva tienda de aplicaciones, que se puede utilizar en cualquier dispositivo Android.

Agarrando de nuevo

Entonces, ¿cómo nada de esto tiene sentido económico? Los analistas esperan que los costos de comercialización se estabilice después de la Navidad, según informa Reuters, por lo que la extravagancia no durará. Y a pesar de que la mayoría de los juegos son gratis, millones de nuevos usuarios que miran los anuncios en los juegos se ofrecen algo a cambio. Pero el premio consiste en la conversión de los jugadores ocasionales a personas que realmente gastan dinero. El tipo de cambio pasó a menos del 5% en octubre, pero los que lo hacen convertir gastar grandes cantidades. En los EE.UU., en octubre, los usuarios pagan gastaron más de $ 21 en sus juegos cada mes, en un momento en el IPC pasó de $ 2.25.
+
El poco complicado será convertir orgullosos nuevos dueños del futuro de los teléfonos y las tabletas a personas dispuestas a gastar dinero en aplicaciones también. Ese proceso dura un par de meses de juego, dice van Dreunen. Es entonces cuando toda la promoción deja de importar. Conseguir la aplicación en tu teléfono es sólo el primer paso, sino que tiene que ser bueno también. " Esto es una reminiscencia de las audiencias de televisión : La mayoría de la gente ve sólo nueve canales con regularidad, a pesar de tener acceso a 1200. Según algunas estimaciones, los jugadores móviles sólo juegan alrededor de media docena de juegos con regularidad ", dice van Dreunen. En el mismo sentido, la gran mayoría de los desarrolladores de aplicaciones y los editores pueden perder esta Navidad. Pero unos pocos se hacen ricos.


Quartz

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More

 
Design by Free WordPress Themes | Bloggerized by Lasantha - Premium Blogger Themes | Best Hostgator Coupon Code